The reason behind this. We have heard enough controversies on Taj Mahal from people of all regions, political parties and Historians. But how many of these people have given proof to their statements is the big question. Except P N Oak in the year who provided pictorial evidences claiming the existence of Hindu idols in the rooms of the basement, none of the Historians have provided solid proof to show whether the structure is a tomb or a Temple. P N Oak had also claimed the carbon dating reports of the foundation of Taj Mahal and the surrounding structures to have been much older than the Shah Jahan period.
The building to its left is now a mosque.
Jan 23, 6. Why has the Archaeological Survey of India blocked any dating of the Taj Mahal by means of Carbon or thermo-luminiscnece? Any controversy over which century the Taj was built could easily be resolved. [Radiocarbon dating of a piece of wood surreptiously taken from one of the doors gave 13th century as a possible date. But more data is.
Had it been built originally as a mosque it would almost certainly have been oriented directly to Mecca, instead of due west. The four "minarets" that surround the Taj mausoleum are inappropriate, for they logically should have been in front of the "mosque" for convenient calls to prayer.
The building to the right of the Taj is a mirror image of the "mosque," yet its function has always been described as residential, an improbable design decision.
No. Marvin Mills himself doesn't say he conducted a radiocarbon dating, regardless it seems historically impossible. All he says it's been done on a piece of wood but doesn't say who and when. The door being years older than Shah Jahan, seems. Jan 09, The origin of the Taj can best be determined through scientific dating by carbon and thermoluminescence, which the Archeological Survey of India should be urged to undertake. Taj Mahal, mausoleum complex in Uttar Pradesh in northern India, built by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century. The complex houses the tombs of Shah Jahan and one of his wives, known as Mumtaz Mahal. Today its stunning architecture has made it one of .
The character of the Taj as a whole suggests gaiety and lightheartedness - hardly appropriate for the universal sentiment of respect for the dead.
Oak translated the Persian script of a section of the court chronicle of Shah Jahan by the courtier Lahori that describes the appropriation of a palace on the site from the grandson of Raja Jaisingh, its last recorded owner.
It is not reasonable to believe that this palace was then destroyed and a new one built in its place as a mausoleum. By converting the complex into a sacred Moslem mausoleum he insured that the Hindus would never want it back. Shahjahan converted the residential quarters to the west of the main building to a mosque simply by modifying the interior of the west wall to create a mihrab niche.
He added Islamic inscriptions around many doorways and entries to give the impression that the Taj Mahal had always been Islamic.
Sure enough, the scholars have been silent or deceived ever since. Yet, Prof Mills through the review of their book, thanked Begley and Desai for having assembled so much useful data and translated contemporary writings and inscriptions.
Where they failed is in accepting an apocryphal legend of the Taj for an absolute fact. Their interpretations and analyses have been forced into the mold of their bias.
Sep 10, Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting that the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era: Professor Marvin Miller of New York took samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon. Jan 22, P N Oak had also claimed the carbon dating reports of the foundation of Taj Mahal and the surrounding structures to have been much older than the Shah Jahan period. But his book was banned by the then Indira Gandhi government which raised many speculations and suspicions of the intentions of the Indira government. Dec 28, Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting that the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era: Professor Marvin Miller of New York took samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was years older than Shah Jahan.
Begley and Z. Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely of the author.
My India My Glory does not assume any responsibility for the validity or information shared in this article by the author. The following two tabs change content below.
Bio Latest Posts. Ravikumar Pillay is a passionate scholar of Indian history, an avid traveller, photographer, writer, counsellor, and teaches meditation.
Taj mahal carbon dating
This is exactly why many historians and people within the ASI were not very happy with the findings. The biggest unanswered questions which still remains is, if the ASI do not have anything to hide, why is the basement area completely sealed?
Secrets of the Taj Mahal - National Geographic
What is in the rooms of the basement that has been locked up for decades? The same issue was raised by Subramanian Swamy few years back in an interview where he said that he was blocked from entering the basement of the Taj Mahal.
Dr Swamy clearly states that in the year he had visited Taj Mahal where he tried to enter the basement. But the rooms were locked and when he asked the Manager, he said he cannot open the doors to the basement. After which Dr Swamy made an appeal to the the Moraji Desai government to allow him to enter the basement.
But he was not given permission to enter the basement and later the Moraji Desai government fell within days after the incident. Dr Swamy also said that he will raise the issue insince the controversy surrounding Taj Mahal is going on since decades and needs a logical end.
What he said was absolutely correct, since the people of India have the right to know the truth behind Taj Mahal controversy. This will put an end to all loose talk by politicians from every political party theorizing new stories every time when their are elections and racking controversies.