Mine tank dating history remarkable

Posted by: Meztiran Posted on: 31.05.2020

amusing piece

He was born on Monday, November 23, Is Tank Richardson married or single, and who is he dating now? Tank Richardson is single. He is not dating anyone currently. Tank had at least 1 relationship in the past.

Tank Richardson is famous for being a YouTuber. He found success as part of a popular couples YouTube channel like Jayzam Manabat. The education details are not available at this time. Please check back soon for ates.

Tank dating history

Tank was born in the s. The s is remembered as a decade of peace, prosperity and the rise of the Internet. People born in the Year of the Tiger are brave and independent. They are respected for their deep thoughts and courageous actions, but sometimes show off when accomplishing something.

Discover the net worth of Tank Richardson on CelebsMoney. Fact Check : We strive for accuracy and fairness. This page is ated often with fresh details about Tank Richardson. Bookmark this page and come back for ates. Dating Trending Random. Sign in. The continued progress in the design of armour, armament, engines, and vehicles was gradually swinging the trend toward more mechanization, and the military value of the horse declined.

Proponents of mechanization and motorization pointed to advances in the motor vehicle industry and to the corresponding decrease in the use of horses and mules. Furthermore, abundant oil resources gave the United States an enviable position of independence in fuel requirements for the machines. Secretary Davis' directive for the development of a tank force resulted in the assembly and encampment of an experimental mechanized force at Camp MeadeMaryland, from 1 July to 20 September An effort to continue the experiment in was defeated by insufficient funds and obsolete equipment, but the exercise did bear fruit, for the War Department Mechanization Board, appointed to study results of the experiment, recommended the permanent establishment of a mechanized force.

As Chief of Staff from toDouglas MacArthur wanted to advance motorization and mechanization throughout the army. In late all arms and services were directed to adopt mechanization and motorization, "as far as is practicable and desirable", and were permitted to conduct research and to experiment as necessary. Cavalry was given the task of developing combat vehicles that would "enhance its power in roles of reconnaissance, counterreconnaissance, flank action, pursuit, and similar operations.

In MacArthur set the stage for the coming complete mechanization of the cavalry, declaring, "The horse has no higher degree of mobility today than he had a thousand years ago. The time has therefore arrived when the Cavalry arm must either replace or assist the horse as a means of transportation, or else pass into the limbo of discarded military formations. The War Department in modified its directive for all arms and services to adopt mechanization and motorization.

Thereafter, development of mechanization was to be accomplished by two of the combat arms only-the cavalry and the infantry. As late ason the other hand, the Chief of Cavalry, Maj. John K. Herrproclaimed, "We must not be misled to our own detriment to assume that the untried machine can displace the proved and tried horse. In testimony before a Congressional committee inMaj.

good topic

Herr maintained that horse cavalry had "stood the acid test of war", whereas the motor elements advocated by some to replace it had not. Actually, between the world wars there was much theoretical but little tangible progress in tank production and tank tactics in the United States.

Production was limited to a few hand-tooled test models, only thirty-five of which were built between and Regarding the use of tanks with infantry, the official doctrine of largely reiterated that of It maintained that "As a rule, tanks are employed to assist the advance of infantry foot troops, either preceding or accompanying the infantry assault echelon.

In the s the American Army began to seriously discuss the integration of the tank and the airplane into existing doctrine, but the US Army remained an infantry-centered Army, even though sufficient changes had occurred to warrant serious study.

matchless message

In the spring ofmaneuvers in Georgia and Louisiana, where Patton was an umpire, showed how far U. Army General Adna R.

suggest you come

Chaffee Jr. World War II forced armies to integrate all the available arms at every level into a mobile, flexible team. The mechanized combined arms force came of age in this war. Inmost armies still thought of an armoured division as a mass of tanks with relatively limited support from the other arms. Bythe same armies had evolved armoured divisions that were a balance of different arms and services, each of which had to be as mobile and almost as protected as the tanks they accompanied.

This concentration of mechanized forces in a small number of mobile divisions left the ordinary infantry unit deficient in armour to accompany the deliberate attack. The German, Soviet, and American armies therefore developed a number of tank surrogates such as tank destroyers and assault guns to perform these functions in cooperation with the infantry.

Armour experts in most armies, however, were determined to avoid being tied to the infantry, and in any event a tank was an extremely complicated, expensive, and therefore scarce weapon.

Every HOI4 Owner Needs To Play Tank Dating Simulator

The British persisted for much of the war on a dual track of development, retaining Infantry tanks to support the infantry and lighter, more mobile cruiser tanks for independent armoured formations.

The Soviets similarly produced an entire series of heavy breakthrough tanks. During the war, German tank design went through at least three generations, plus constant minor variations.

The history of the tank begins with World War I, when armoured all-terrain fighting vehicles were introduced as a response to the problems of trench warfare, ushering in a new era of mechanized mcauctionservicellc.com initially crude and unreliable, tanks eventually became a mainstay of ground armies. By World War II, tank design had advanced significantly, and tanks were used in quantity in all land Country: Australia, United Kingdom, Cuba, China, . Feb 04,   Tank Richardson is single. He is not dating anyone currently. Tank had at least 1 relationship in the past. Tank Richardson has not been previously engaged. He and Kimari have been based in Los Angeles, California. According to our records, he has no children. Like many celebrities and famous people, Tank keeps his personal and love life mcauctionservicellc.comality: American. The tank was repaired and returned to action in Luxembourg. There, tank commander Charles Trover was killed by a sniper on December 23 as he stood in Cobra King's turret. Trover was replaced by Lt. Charles Boggess who commanded Cobra King during the Battle of the Bulge.

The first generation included such prewar vehicles as the Panzerkampfwagen or Panzer I and II, which were similar to Soviet and British light tanks. However, the appearance of large numbers of the new generation T and KV-1 Soviet tanks, that were unknown to Germans untilcompelled them to join a race for superior armour and gun power. The third generation included many different variants, but the most important designs were the Panther Panzer V and Tiger Panzer VI tanks.

Unfortunately for the Germans, lack of resources combined with emphasis on protection and firepower and a penchant for overly complex design philosophies in nearly every part of an armoured fighting vehicle's design compromised the production numbers.

The alternative to constant changes in tank design was to standardize a few basic designs and mass-produce them even though technology had advanced to new improvements. This was the solution of Germany's principal opponents. The Soviet T, for example, was an excellent basic design that survived the war with only one major change in armament, The United States had even more reason to standardize and mass-produce than did the Soviet Union.

By concentrating on mechanical reliability, the US was able to produce vehicles that operated longer with fewer repair parts. To ensure that American tanks were compatible with American bridging equipment, the War Department restricted tank width and maximum weight to thirty tons.

The army relaxed these requirements only in late When Germany invaded western Europe inthe US Army had only 28 new tanks - 18 medium and 10 light - and these were soon to become obsolete, along with some older models on hand. The Army had no heavy tanks and no immediate plans for any.

Dec 18,   History of the Tank. The Tank is a very historic timepiece that dates back to the early s. Although there are many watchmakers that hung their shingle centuries ago, there are few that have continued to produce the same model for such a lengthy period. Instead of studying military history and doctrine, he's in "Basic Artillery Computations for Fire Support ", and "Radio Operations ". Will he win the heart of the tank-girls, or end up as cannon fodder? Only you can decide in, "Panzermadels: Tank Dating Simulator".9/10(1K).

Even more serious than the shortage of tanks was industry's lack of experience in tank manufacture and limited production facilities. Furthermore, the United States was committed to helping supply its allies. By American tank production had soared to just under 25, almost doubling the combined British and German output for that year.

And inthe peak tank production year, the total was 29, All in all, from throughUS tank production totaled 88, Tank designs of World War II were based upon many complex considerations, but the principal factors were those thought to be best supported by combat experience. Among these, early combat proved that a bigger tank was not necessarily a better tank.

The development goal came to be a tank combining all the proven characteristics in proper balance, to which weight and size were only incidentally related. The key characteristics were mechanical reliability, firepower, mobility and protection. The problem here was that only a slight addition to the thickness of armour plate greatly increased the total weight of the tank, thereby requiring a more powerful and heavier engine. This, in turn, resulted in a larger and heavier transmission and suspension system.

Just this sort of "vicious circle" aimed at upgrading a tank's most vital characteristics tended to make the tank less maneuverable, slower, and a larger and easier target. Determining the point at which the optimum thickness of armour was reached, in balance with other factors, presented a challenge that resulted in numerous proposed solutions and much disagreement.

According to Lt. Lesley J. Since emphasis of the using arms was upon light tanks during an their production at first was almost two to one over the mediums. But inas the demand grew for more powerful tanks, the lights fell behind, and by the number of light tanks produced was less than half the number of mediums.

apologise, but

The tank destroyer was deemed too specialized to justify in a peacetime force structure. In a reversal of previous doctrine, the US Army concluded that "the medium tank is the best antitank weapon. Soviet domination of the Warsaw Pact led to effective standardization on a few tank designs. In comparison, NATO adopted a defensive posture. After World War II, tank development continued. Tanks would not only continue to be produced in huge numbers, but the technology advanced dramatically as well.

Medium tanks became heavier, their armour became thicker and their firepower increased. This led gradually to the concept of the main battle tank and the gradual elimination of the heavy tank. cts of gun technology changed significantly as well, with advances in shell design and effectiveness.

Are mistaken. tank dating history think, that

Many of the changes in tank design have been refinements to targeting and ranging fire controlgun stabilization, communications and crew comfort. Armour evolved to keep pace with improvements in weaponry - the rise of composite armour is of particular note - and guns grew more powerful. However, basic tank architecture did not change significantly, and has remained largely the same into the 21st century.

With the end of the Cold War inquestions once again started sprouting concerning the relevance of the traditional tank.

mine the

Over the years, many nations cut back the number of their tanks or replaced most of them with lightweight armoured fighting vehicles with only minimal armour protection. This period also brought an end to the superpower blocs, and the military industries of Russia and Ukraine are now vying to sell tanks worldwide.

India and Pakistan have upgraded old tanks and bought new Ts and Ts from the former Soviet states. Both have demonstrated prototypes that the respective countries are not adopting for their own use, but are designed exclusively to compete with the latest western offerings on the open market. It has a new turret with auto-loaderbut imitates western designs with an armoured ammunition compartment to improve crew survivability. An early mock-up, shown for the first time at the second VTTV-Omsk International Exhibition of Armaments inappears to have dramatically heavier armour, and a completely new modern turret separating crew and ammunition.

Russia is also rumoured to be developing the Obiekt MBT, sometimes called Twith a remote-controlled turret, for domestic service. The tank is nearly the same size of the very first tank, both being 8 feet 2. A number of armies have considered eliminating tanks completely, reverting to a mix of wheeled anti-tank guns and infantry fighting vehicles IFVthough in general there is a great deal of resistance because all of the great powers still maintain large numbers of them, in active forces or in ready reserve.

There has been no proven alternative, and tanks have had a relatively good track record in recent conflicts. The tank continues to be vulnerable to many kinds of anti-tank weapons and is more logistically demanding than lighter vehicles, but these were traits that were true for the first tanks as well.

In direct fire combat they offer an unmatched combination of higher survivability and firepower among ground-based warfare systems. Whether this combination is particularly useful in proportion to their cost is matter of debate, as there also exist very effective anti-tank systems, IFVs, and competition from air-based ground attack systems. Due to vulnerability from RPGsthe tank has always had local defense from machine guns to solve the problem. This partially solved the problem in some cases, but produced another.

commit error

Because the machine gun had to be operated by the commander from outside the tank, it made him vulnerable to enemy fire. To solve this problem, gun shields were made to reduce this threat, but did not completely solve the problem. So, when the development of the M1A2 TUSK Tank Urban Survival Kit came, the finalization of a remote machine gun came into place, and was one of the first main battle tanks to have one.

It can also be equipped with an optional grenade launcher. Possibly one of the main evolution sources for tanks in this century are the active protection systems. Until 15 years ago, armour reactive or passive was the only effective measure against anti-tank assets. If these kinds of systems evolve further and are integrated in contemporary tank and armoured vehicle fleets, the armour-antitank equation will change completely; therefore, 21st century tanks would experience a total revival in terms of operational capabilities.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. History of the tank. Light tank Medium tank Heavy tank Super-heavy tank Cruiser tank Infantry tank Main battle tank Tank destroyer Tankette Assault gun Self-propelled gun Self-propelled anti-aircraft weapon Self-propelled artillery Self-propelled mortar Multiple rocket launcher. Play media. This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. April WWI tanks. List Category. Main article: Tanks in World War I.

apologise, but, opinion

Main article: Tanks This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

Can suggest tank dating history remarkable

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Interwar tanks. World War II tanks. Main article: Tanks in the Cold War. Cold War tanks. Main article: Tanks of the post-Cold War era. Post-Cold War tanks. History portal Tanks portal. On Armor.

Good question tank dating history strange Really?

Greenwood Publishing Group. Military Innovation in the Interwar Period. New York: Cambridge University Press. Harvey p. Profile Publications.

The phrase tank dating history something is

The Strand Magazine. German patent no. Patent no. Archived from the original on Production Technology. Archived from the original on Retrieved Farm Collector.

Change language. Install Steam. Your Store. Browse Browse. Community Hub. The first dating simulator to deliver a thoughtful look at tanks, and the men who date them! Recent Reviews:. All Reviews:. Popular user-defined tags for this product:. Sign in or Open in Steam.

similar. Excuse

Share Embed. Add to Cart. Who happen to look just like Japanese School Girls! Instead of studying military history and doctrine, he's in "Basic Artillery Computations for Fire Support ", and "Radio Operations ". Will he win the heart of the tank-girls, or end up as cannon fodder?

Only you can decide in, "Panzermadels: Tank Dating Simulator". Unabashedly goofy, the game takes every trope you know from visual novels, and puts a distinctly Tank-Related twist on them! With six different romance plot-lines and a multiple of endings based on your choices, Panzermadels will keep you entertained for a number of playthroughs! Meet Fun and Interesting People Tanks.

Facebook twitter google_plus reddit linkedin


1 Replies to “Tank dating history”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *